Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20010816

Docket: IMM-5981-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 904

BETWEEN:

                                                                 DO THI KIM HUYEN

                                                                                                                                                   Applicant

                                                                             - and -

                                                                    THE MINISTER OF

                                                    CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                              Respondent

                                                              REASONS FOR ORDER

                             (Delivered Orally from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta

                                                    on Thursday, August 16, 2001)

                                                                                                                                                                       

LEMIEUX, J.

[1]                 The visa officer refused the applicant's application for a temporary employment visa because she did not believe she was a professional cook and qualified for the job. The applicant was interviewed.

[2]                 The visa officer gave no weight to a certificate issued by The House of Culture stating she had completed a cooking course. The visa officer came to the conclusion The House of Culture was not an officially recognized vocational training centre.


[3]                 She obtained that information from the staff at the Canadian Consulate General who investigated the issue after the interview had been held.

[4]                 It is clear from Muliadi v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration (1986) 2 F.C. 205 that it is a breach of procedural fairness, before disposing of the application, not to have informed the applicant and giving her a fair opportunity of addressing the issue.

[5]                 Moreover, the visa officer rejected documentary evidence proving she had worked as a cook in a restaurant in Vietnam because it was not on letterhead and was handwritten. I find that a rejection of documentary proof on this basis, without more verification to be unreasonable.

[6]                 This judicial review application is allowed.

                                                                                                                                      "François Lemieux"

                                                                                                                                                           JUDGE

Calgary, Alberta

August 16, 2001


                                                  

                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                  TRIAL DIVISION

Date: 20010816

Docket: IMM-5981-00

BETWEEN:

                               DO THI KIM HUYEN

                                                                                        Applicant

                                              - and -


                                THE MINISTER OF

                CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                    Respondent

                                                                                                                              

                          REASONS FOR ORDER

                                                                                                                              


                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

                                           NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                          IMM-5981-00

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                        Do Thi Kim Huyen v. MCI

                                                                                                

PLACE OF HEARING:                                  CALGARY, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:                                    August 16, 2001

REASONS FOR ORDER OF LEMIEUX, J.

DATED:                                                             August 16, 2001

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Peter Wong                                                                                        FOR APPLICANT

Ms. Tracy King                                                                                         FOR RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Caron & Partners, LLP

Calgary, Alberta                                                                                       FOR APPLICANT

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada           FOR RESPONDENT


Date: 20010816

Docket: IMM-5981-00

CALGARY, Alberta, Thursday, the 16th day of August, 2001.

Present:                                                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LEMIEUX

BETWEEN:

                                                                            DO THI KIM HUYEN

                                                                                                                                                                                   Applicant

                                                                                           - and -

                                                                             THE MINISTER OF

                                                             CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                                               Respondent

                                                                                         ORDER

This judicial review is allowed, the decision of the visa officer is set aside and the applicant's application for a temporary employment visa is to be reconsidered by a different visa officer.

                                                                                                                                                                 "François Lemieux"

                                                                                                                                                                                     JUDGE

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.