Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20021023

Docket: T-750-02

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 1100

Winnipeg, Manitoba, this 23rd day of October, 2002

PRESENT:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN A. O'KEEFE

BETWEEN:

                                                                    LUC FOURNIER

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                              - and -

                                           THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

O'KEEFE J.

[1]                 This is a motion made by the applicant on October 7, 2002 for leave to serve and file a further affidavit of Luc Fournier, dated September 30, 2002.

[2]                 A perusal of the affidavit shows that it is primarily a reorganization of the applicant's first affidavit, which he filed without the assistance of counsel.

[3]                 The respondent takes exception to paragraphs 11 and 19 of the proposed affidavit and states that it is not necessary to file the further affidavit.

[4]                 I have reviewed paragraphs 11 and 19 and I am of the view that both paragraphs can remain part of the affidavit. Paragraph 11 states that two supervisors were not trained complaint assessors. It seems to me that this is a statement of fact. The applicant may be right or wrong about this fact. I should add that there does not appear to be a definition for "complaint assessor" and the applicant addresses this argument as a procedural right to have trained complaint assessors.

[5]                 As to paragraph 19 of the affidavit, this paragraph also makes statements of fact.

[6]                 I am satisfied that the proposed affidavit meets the test for granting leave:    it serves the interests of justice, it will assist the Court in deciding the final issue and it will not cause substantial prejudice to the respondent (see Wayzhushk Onigum Nation v. Kakeway, [2000] F.C.J. No. 156 (QL) (Proth.) and Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc., [1997] F.C.J. No. 1240 (QL) (T.D.)).

[7]                 The applicant's motion for leave to serve and file the further affidavit of Luc Fournier, dated September 30, 2002, is granted. The affidavit is to be served and filed within two days of the receipt of this order.


[8]                 As Justice Noel ordered that cross-examinations of the parties were to have been completed no later than October 11, 2002, I order that cross-examinations of the parties shall be completed by November 8, 2002.

[9]                 There shall be no order as to costs.

ORDER

[10]            IT IS ORDERED that:

1.          Leave to serve and file the further affidavit of Luc Fournier is granted and the affidavit is to be served and filed within two days of the receipt of this order.

2.          Cross-examinations of the parties shall be completed by November 8, 2002.

    

                                                                                                                                         "John A. O'Keefe"                     

                                                                                                                                                          J.F.C.C.                      

Winnipeg, Manitoba

October 23, 2002


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                 TRIAL DIVISION

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                T-750-02

STYLE OF CAUSE: LUC FOURNIER

- and -

THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                   

PLACE OF HEARING:         Edmonton, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:           Monday, October 7, 2002

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER OF O'KEEFE J.

DATED:                                   Wednesday, October 23, 2002

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Melodi Ulku

FOR APPLICANT

Mr. Rick Garvin

FOR RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Bishop & McKenzie LLP

Suite 2500

10104 - 103 Avenue

Edmonton, Alberta

T5J 1V3

FOR APPLICANT

Department of Justice

211 Bank of Montreal Building

10199 - 101 Street

Edmonton, Alberta

T5J 3Y4

FOR RESPONDENT


                                                  

                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                  TRIAL DIVISION

  

Date: 20021023

Docket: T-750-02

BETWEEN:

LUC FOURNIER

Applicant

- and -

THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

                                                                                                                              

             REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

  

                                                                                                                              

   
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.