Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040225

Docket: DES-3-03

Citation: 2004 FC 338

Ottawa, Ontario, the 25th day of February 2004

Present:           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SIMON NOËL

BETWEEN:

                                                          IN THE MATTER OF a

certificate under subsection 77(1) of the Immigration

and Refugee Protection Act,

S.C. 2001, c. 27 (the IRPA);

IN THE MATTER OF the referral

of this certificate to the Federal Court of Canada

under subsection 77(1) and sections 78

and 80 of the IRPA;

IN THE MATTER OF the warrant for

the arrest and detention as well as the review

of the reasons for the continued detention under

subsections 82(1), 83(1) and 83(3) of the IRPA

AND IN THE MATTER OF

Adil Charkaoui


REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                Adil Charkaoui is seeking, under rule 369 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 (hereinafter the "Rules"), to stay the proceedings (including the hearing scheduled for the first week of April 2004, to determine whether the certificate is reasonable).

[2]                This motion complies with section 79 of the IRPA, because Mr. Charkaoui applied to the Minister for protection pursuant to subsection 112(1) of IRPA.

[3]                This application for protection was signed by Mr. Charkaoui on June 13, 2003, and the Ministers informed the Court, in a letter dated February 3, 2004, that it was unlikely that there would be a response to the application before April 5, 2004, the date scheduled to begin the hearing regarding the certificate.

[4]                Upon review of section 79 of IRPA, it appears that the undersigned does not have any discretion to exercise once this application to stay the proceedings has been made, even though IRPA obliges the Court to proceed expeditiously (see paragraph 78(c)).

[5]                Moreover, Mr. Charkaoui's counsel indicated, by ordinary mail, that Mr. Charkaoui wished to file a motion to disqualify. A direction to proceed as such by way of motion was therefore issued under the Rules by the undersigned.

[6]                The dates set aside to address the issue of disqualification remain the same as those for the hearing of this motion. Once this motion and the Ministers' reply on this subject have been filed, a decision will be made regarding the dates to set aside for the hearing on the reasonableness of the certificate, after consultation with counsel.

ORDER

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT:

-           Allows the proceedings pertaining to the certificate issued by the Ministers against Mr. Charkaoui to be stayed;

-           The scheduled dates for the hearing in the week of April 5, 2004 remain.

                 "Simon Noël"                  

Judge

Certified true translation

Kelley A. Harvey, BA, BCL, LLB


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                  DES-3-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                  MCI v. ADIL CHARKAOUI

WRITTEN MOTION CONSIDERED WITHOUT APPEARANCE BY THE PARTIES

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER BY:         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SIMON NOËL

DATE OF REASONS:                              FEBRUARY 25, 2004

APPEARANCES:

Johanne Doyon                                            FOR THE APPLICANT

Julius Grey

Luc Cadieux                                                 FOR THE RESPONDENT

Daniel Latulippe

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Doyon, Morin                                              FOR THE APPLICANT

Montréal, Quebec

Julius Grey

Montréal, Quebec

Morris Rosenberg                                       FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.