Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020513

Docket: IMM-859-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 549

CALGARY, Alberta, Monday, the 13th day of May, 2002.

Present:           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CAMPBELL

BETWEEN:

                                               AHMED BEN MOHAMED LANDOLSI

                                                                                                                                                         Applicant

                                                                              - and -

                                THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

                                                                                                                                                                       

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

CAMPBELL, J.:

[1]                 In the present case, the Applicant applied on humanitarian and compassionate grounds to be landed from within Canada as the spouse of a Canadian citizen. In fact, his humanitarian and compassionate application cited this as the only ground advanced for positive determination.

[2]                 The Applicant and his sponsoring wife were extensively interviewed by the Immigration Officer with the result that, because of "discrepancies" between their accounts of the circumstances of the marriage, the Immigration Officer concluded that the marriage was not bona fide. Obviously, the Applicant's credibility was seriously in issue in reaching this decision.

[3]                 Effectively, the Applicant's response to the identified discrepancies was that he has memory problems. To legitimize this claim he attempted to provide a doctor's letter which was not accepted by the Immigration Officer. This non-acceptance was based on a finding that the IRB in the Applicant's previously decided unsuccessful refugee claim had "dealt with" the letter (Applicant's Application Record, P. 39). That is, the Immigration Officer did not consider the letter because the IRB had already given it no weight with respect to the Applicant's argued memory problems. In fact, this is not correct. It is not contested that the IRB made no such determination.

[4]                 I find that the Immigration Officer's misunderstanding of the IRB's decision significantly, and unfairly, affected his reasoning in rejecting the Applicant's humanitarian and compassionate application. As a result, I am satisfied the decision was made in reviewable error.


                                                                             ORDER

[5]                           Accordingly I set aside the immigration officer's decision and refer this matter to a different immigration officer for redetermination.

                                                                                                                                  "Douglas R. Campbell"

                                                                                                                                                           JUDGE

Calgary, Alberta

May 13, 2002


                                                                                                

                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

Date: 20020513

Docket: IMM-859-01

BETWEEN:

                                                            AHMED BEN MOHAMED LANDOLSI

                                                                                                                                                                                   Applicant

                                                                                           - and -


                                                               THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                                                                              & IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                                               Respondent

                                                                                                                                                                            

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

                                                                                                                                                                            


                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

                                           NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                          IMM-859-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                        AHMED BEN MOHAMED LANDOLSI

v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

& IMMIGRATION        

                                                                                                

PLACE OF HEARING:                                  CALGARY, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:                                    May 13, 2002

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER : CAMPBELL, J.


DATED:                                                             May 13, 2002

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Michael Sherritt                                                                                    FOR APPLICANT

Mr. Brad Hardstaff                                                                                      FOR RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Sherritt Greene

Calgary, Alberta                                                                                          FOR APPLICANT

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada                  FOR RESPONDENT



 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.