Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20011003

Docket: IMM-4164-01

Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 1087

BETWEEN:

                                                                    LJUBICA TOSIC

                                                                                                                                                     Applicant

                                                                             - and -

                               THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                               Respondent

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER

LEMIEUX J.:

[1]                 The applicant, a 69-year-old citizen of the Yugoslav Federation, seeks a stay of removal from Canada.

[2]                 Her underlying leave application challenges an August 21, 2001 decision made by a Post Claim Determination Officer ("PCDO") that she was not a member of the PDRCC class. The applicant's written challenge and oral submissions by her daughter raise no serious issue that this decision was wrong.

[3]                 The applicant apparently made an abortive attempt to file an H & C application in May of 2000 which was not processed because the Case Processing Centre in Vagreville, Alberta never received it nor were fees paid.

[4]                 Last week, the applicant filed a fresh H & C application and, of course, no decision has yet been made. It is well-known that, in and of itself, an outstanding H & C application is not a ground for deferring a removal given the statutory duty in section 48 of the Immigration Act to execute removals as soon as practicable.

[5]                 The applicant has not shown any grounds why her removal should not take place despite her difficult individual circumstances and those of her daughter and granddaughter who are Canadian citizens.

[6]                 Her H & C application will be processed in her absence and, in the circumstances, the authorities may process that application expeditiously.

[7]                 This stay application is dismissed.

                                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

                                                                                                                                                       J U D G E            

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.