Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20050602

                                                                                                                      Docket: IMM-2372-05

                                                                                                                        Citation: 2005 FC 797

BETWEEN:

                                                      MASUD AHMAD SHEIKH

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                           THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                                        REASONS FOR ORDER

PHELAN J.

[1]                The Applicant has requested a stay of deportation pending his application for judicial review and, if granted, the judicial review itself. He has applied for leave in respect of a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) in which he was found not to be at risk if he returned to Pakistan.

[2]                His PRRA application was based on his membership in the Jammu and Kashmir People's National Party (JKPNP) which is a minority political party struggling for the independence of the provinces of Jammu and Kashmir for both India and Pakistan.


[3]                The Applicant had made a refugee claim on precisely the same grounds. The Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) rejected his claim because he was found not to be a credible and trustworthy witness. The Board held, for all intents and purposes, that he was not a member of the JKPNP, therefore he would not be persecuted on this basis.

[4]                The Applicant raised a number of legal issues in respect of the PRRA decision including the absence of weight given to the Applicant's mother's letter, the failure of the PRRA Officer to undertake the verification of documents (which the Applicant had not verified), and, most importantly, the Officer's admission of conducting her own independent research of country conditions.

[5]                Even if the Applicant has raised a "serious issue" as that term is used in respect of the tripartite test for the grant of a stay, the Applicant faces the significant hurdle of establishing irreparable harm.

[6]                The harm which the Applicant alleges arises from his membership in the JKPNP. There has been a finding by the IRB, which remains undisturbed, that the Applicant failed to prove his membership. It therefore follows that within the PRRA context he has no objective basis for his fear of being returned.


[7]                His legal challenges in Canada are unaffected by his removal. His H & C application, filed a week ago, cannot form the basis for a request for a stay. Nor can his claim that a business he set up will suffer - this is a natural consequence of a deportation.

[8]                Therefore having failed to satisfy the Court that he will suffer irreparable harm if the stay is not granted, this application must be dismissed.

                                                                                                                             (s) "Michael Phelan"          

Judge


                                                             FEDERAL COURT

                            NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                           IMM-2372-05

STYLE OF CAUSE:               MASUD AHMAD SHEIKH v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

PLACE OF HEARING:                     TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                       May 30, 2005

REASONS FOR ORDER:                Phelan J.

DATED:                                              June 2, 2005

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Daniel Kwong                                                                                          FOR THE APPLICANT

Ms. Jeremiah Eastman                                                                                 FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD:

Green and Spiegel


Toronto, Ontario                                                                                             FOR THE APPLICANT

Mr. John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                                                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.