Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                  Date: 20050606

                                                                                                                      Docket: IMM-5972-04

                                                                                                                        Citation: 2005 FC 808

BETWEEN:

                                                   VIMALINI BALACHANDRAN

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                           THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                                        REASONS FOR ORDER

PHELAN J.

[1]                The Applicant brought this application for judicial review to overturn a decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) denying her application for refugee status which decision was based entirely on credibility.

[2]                The IRB found the Applicant's evidence confusing and contradictory. It found significant omissions in her PIF. It found her story lacked credibility and lacked plausibility.


[3]                A review of the transcript of her testimony would confirm that all of this is accurate. However it is not for this Court to make credibility findings. The Court looks to see if these findings were perverse and made without regard for the evidence.

[4]                The IRB relied on documentary evidence, something which is within their sphere of competence. There is nothing unreasonable about the IRB's conclusion.

[5]                The Applicant relied on a doctor's letter, to the effect that she suffered anxiety and depression, to explain her confusing and contradictory testimony. However there is no evidence that there is any connection between her condition and her failure to answer questions, her evasiveness or her contradictory statements.

[6]                Therefore there is no basis upon which this Court should intervene in this decision.

[7]                For these reasons, this application shall be dismissed.

[8]                There is no question to be certified.

                                                                                                                         (s) "Michael L. Phelan"          

Judge


                                                             FEDERAL COURT

                            NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                           IMM-5972-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:               VIMALINI BALACHANDRAN v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:                       June 2, 2005

REASONS FOR ORDER:                Phelan J.

DATED:                                              June 6, 2005

APPEARANCES:

Mr. John O. Grant                                                                                          FOR THE APPLICANT

Ms. Angela Marinos                                                                                    FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD:


John O. Grant

Mississauga, Ontario                                                                                       FOR THE APPLICANT

Mr. John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                                                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.