Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020515

Docket: IMM-2506-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 563

CALGARY, Alberta, Wednesday, the 15th day of May, 2002.

Present:           THE HONORABLE MR. JUSTICE CAMPBELL

BETWEEN:

                                              CLAUDIA ESMERAL SORIANO CRUZ

                                                                                                                                                         Applicant

                                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                   

                                                                              - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

CAMPBELL, J.:


[1]                 The present case concerns a potential persecutory threat received by a father against the life of his daughter. As a result, the Applicant daughter seeks protection as a Convention refugee. An important feature of the hearing held before the CRDD is that the father testified by telephone from El Salvador in Spanish resulting in technical and translation difficulties. The CRDD rejected the Applicant's claim basically on findings of negative credibility.

[2]                 I am satisfied on the record that there is a fundamental misunderstanding of the evidence provided in Spanish and translated into English. In particular, the evidence with respect to two linear events concerning persecution were erroneously intermixed, with the result that the fundamental persecutory event of a threat against the Applicant's life was not properly considered. The result is a decision made in reviewable error.

                                                                             ORDER

[3]                 Accordingly, I set the CRDD's decision aside and refer this matter to a different panel for redetermination.

[4]                 Because I am satisfied that the fundamental misunderstanding of the evidence is due to the contemporaneous translation into English of evidence given in Spanish over the telephone, I direct that the redetermination be conducted by the CRDD panel accepting oral evidence in Spanish, and having that oral evidence translated and transcribed in its entirety into English, before any cross-examination is conducted and any decision is rendered on the merits of the claim.

[5]                 I further direct that upon completion of all oral evidence, a transcript be produced and an opportunity be provided to counsel to make written submissions.

                                                                                                                                  "Douglas R. Campbell"

                                                                                                                                                           JUDGE

Calgary, Alberta

May 15, 2002


                                                                                                

                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

Date: 20020515

Docket: IMM-2506-01

BETWEEN:

                                                           CLAUDIA ESMERAL SORIANO CRUZ

                                                                                                                                                                                   Applicant

                                                                                           - and -


                                                               THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                                                                           AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                                               Respondent

                                                                                                                                                                            

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

                                                                                                                                                                            



                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

                                           NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                          IMM-2506-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                        CLAUDIA ESMERAL SORIANO CRUZ

v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION            

                                                                                                

PLACE OF HEARING:                                  CALGARY, Alberta

DATE OF HEARING:                                    May 15, 2002

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER : CAMPBELL, J.


DATED:                                                             May 15, 2002

APPEARANCES:

Mrs. D. Jean Munn                                                                                      FOR APPLICANT

Ms. Kerry Franklin                                                                                      RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Caron & Partners

Calgary, Alberta                                                                                          FOR APPLICANT

Morris Rosenberg

Attorney General of Canada                                                                       FOR RESPONDENT


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.