Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                            Date: 20010531

                                                                                                                                       Docket: T-2048-00

Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 567

BETWEEN:

MICHEL LAVOIE

Applicant

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

BLAIS J.

[1]         There are two motions before the Court: one by the applicant, for a default judgment pursuant to his action filed November 3, 2000, given that the respondent has not filed any defence to his action.

[2]         On the other hand, the Court also has before it a motion by the respondent to strike out the applicant's motion for default judgment.


[3]         Let us briefly recall the facts. On December 8, 2000, the respondent served on the applicant a motion to strike out certain allegations and conclusions in the applicant's statement of claim.

[4]         On March 2, 2001, Prothonotary Richard Morneau dismissed the motion to strike out presented by the respondent and ordered that the defence be filed within thirty days.

[5]         On March 30, 2001, the respondent served the applicant with a motion for particulars, which was dismissed by the Court today.

[6]         The respondent argues that its filing of the motion for particulars constitutes an application for extension of time; I note that the respondent did not request any additional time in which to be able to comply with the order of Prothonotary Morneau, but in the circumstances it is legitimate to think that the respondent could hardly file its statement of defence before knowing the Court's decision on its motion for particulars.

[7]         Consequently, THE COURT ORDERS:

-            That the motion for default judgment be dismissed without costs;

-            That the motion to strike out the motion for default judgment be dismissed for mootness, the whole without costs;


-            That an additional thirty days be given to the respondent in which to serve and file its statement of defence in this matter.

Pierre Blais

J.

OTTAWA, ONTARIO

May 31, 2001

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a.


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

TRIAL DIVISION

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET NO:                          T-2048-00       

STYLE:                                       MICHEL LAVOIE

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

WRITTEN MOTIONS EXAMINED WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER OF BLAIS J.

DATED:                                     May 31, 2001

WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS BY:

Michel Lavoie                                                        REPRESENTING HIMSELF

Sébastien Gagné                                                                FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                                                                FOR THE RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.