Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20180328


Docket: IMM-4077-17

Citation: 2018 FC 348

Toronto, Ontario, March 28, 2018

PRESENT:  The Honourable Madam Justice Heneghan

BETWEEN:

YUZHU YANG

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

JUDGMENT AND REASONS

[1]  Ms. Yuzhu Yang (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of an Officer (the “Officer”) refusing her application for a study permit, as authorized by the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 (the “Regulations”).

[2]  The decision of the Officer is reviewable on the standard of reasonableness; see the decision in Akomolafe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 472.

[3]  According to the decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, [2008] 1 S.C. R. 190, the standard or reasonableness requires that a decision be transparent, justifiable and intelligible, falling within a range of possible outcomes that is defensible on the law and the facts.

[4]   I agree with the submissions of the Applicant that the decision in this case does not meet the applicable standard and appears to be based on speculation about the business activities of the Applicant’s father in Canada.

[5]  In the result, the application for judicial review is allowed, the decision is set aside and the matter remitted to another Officer for re-determination, no question for certification arising.

 


JUDGMENT

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that the application for judicial review is allowed, the decision is set aside and the matter remitted to another Officer for re-determination, no question for certification arising.

"E. Heneghan"

Judge

 


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


 

Docket:

IMM-4077-17

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

YUZHU YANG v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

March 28, 2018

 

JUDGMENT and reasons:

HENEGHAN J.

 

DATED:

March 28, 2018

 

APPEARANCES:

Robert Gertler

 

For The Applicant

 

Hillary Adams

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Robert Gertler

Barrister and Solicitor

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Applicant

 

Attorney General of Canada

 

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.