385 result(s)
-
1.
Macleod v. Canada (Veterans Review and Appeal Board) - 1998-04-03
Federal Court DecisionsMacleod v. Canada (Veterans Review and Appeal Board), Macleod c. Canada (Veterans Review and Appeal Board), T-2863-96 [...] VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD CANADA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA [...] VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD CANADA Defendant REASONS FOR ORDER
-
2.
Ewing v. Veterans Review and Appeal Board - 1997-10-15
Federal Court DecisionsEwing v. Veterans Review and Appeal Board, Ewing c. Tribunal des anciens combattants (Révision et Appel) [...] VETERANS REVIEW and APPEAL BOARD CANADA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA [...] The applicant further appealed the decision of the Entitlement Board to the Veterans Review and Appeal Board.
-
3.
Thiel v. Canada (Veterans Review and Appeal Board) - 2000-11-28
Federal Court DecisionsThiel v. Canada (Veterans Review and Appeal Board), Thiel c. Canada (Tribunal des Anciens Combattants), T-1468-99 [...] VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER [...] This appeal is still pending before the Court of Appeal. [7] On June 27, 2000, a notice of status review was issued to the parties.
-
4.
Clarke v. Canada (Veterans Review and Appeal Board) - 2009 FC 298 - 2009-03-20
Federal Court DecisionsVETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents [...] Sergeant Clarke appealed that decision to an Entitlement Review Panel of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board (Appeal Board). [...] VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA
-
5.
King v. Canada (Veterans Review and Appeal Board) - 2001 FCT 535 - 2001-05-29
Federal Court DecisionsTHE VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD CANADA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA [...] The analogous section 3 of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act does not, however. [...] [Veterans Review and Appeal Board, Decision No. 69665033, April 1, 1998, at page 2.]
-
6.
Moreau v. Veterans Review and Appeal Board - 2013 FC 168 - 2013-02-19
Federal Court DecisionsVETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD CANADA AND VETERANS AFFAIRS CANADA [...] Decisions of the Veteran’s Review and Appeal Board are final and binding. [...] STYLE OF CAUSE: JOSEPH L.R. MOREAU v. VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD CANADA AND VETERANS AFFAIRS CANADA
-
7.
Whitty v. Veterans Review and Appeal Board - 2019 FC 1125 - 2019-09-03
Federal Court DecisionsVETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents [...] [1] Mr. Kevin Joseph Whitty (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board (the “Board”), constituted pursuant to the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act, S.C. 1995, c.18 (the “VRAB Act”). [...] KEVIN JOSEPH WHITTY v VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
-
8.
Grant v. Canada (Veterans Review and Appeal Board) - 2006 FC 1456 - 2006-11-30
Federal Court DecisionsVETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD CANADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA [...] [1] Mr. James Grant (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board (the “VRAB” or “Appeal Board”), dated July 14, 2005. [...] STYLE OF CAUSE: James Grant and Veterans Review and Appeal Board Canada and Attorney General of Canada
-
9.
Mackay v. Canada (Attorney General) - 1997-04-24
Federal Court DecisionsThis is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board (hereinafter VRAB). [...] The Veterans" Review and Appeal Board Decision at Issue In 1995, Parliament made changes to the structure of the appeal and review process for veterans' pensions. [...] The VRAB now acts as the sole review and appeal authority for war veterans" pensions.
-
10.
Machoun v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2022 FC 1604 - 2022-11-22
Federal Court Decisions[1] Ms. Machoun seeks judicial review of the November 5, 2021 decision of the National Second Level Appeals Unit [Appeal Decision] of Veterans Affairs Canada [VAC] denying her request for funding for neuro optometry rehabilitation services under the Veterans Well-being Act, SC 2005, c 21 [VWBA]. [...] C. Appeal Decision Under Review [12] Ms. Machoun appealed the April 2021 denial to the National Second Level Appeals Unit. [...] this application for judicial review is granted; 2. the decision of Veterans Affairs Canada, dated November 5, 2021 is set aside and the appeal is to be reconsidered by a different decision-maker; and
-
11.
Trainor v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2000-04-18
Federal Court Decisions[6] The relevant statutory provisions for the purposes of this judicial review are sections 3, 31 and 39 of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act2 and sections 1.01 and 35 and paragraph 37(3)(a) of the War Veterans Allowance Act. Subsections 3, 31 and 39 of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act and the opening words [...] ... [7] Sections 1.01 and 35 of the War Veterans Allowance Act are to the same effect as sections 3 and 39 of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act. [...] [15] As noted earlier, the decision of the War Veterans Allowance Board was reviewed by the Federal Court of Appeal.
-
12.
Pelletier v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2022 FC 1002 - 2022-07-07
Federal Court Decisions[3] The application for judicial review is therefore allowed and Mr. Pelletier’s appeal is remitted to a differently constituted appeal panel of the VRAB for redetermination. [...] [48] The application for judicial review is therefore granted. Mr. Pelletier’s appeal is remitted for redetermination by a differently constituted appeal panel of the VRAB. [...] The application for judicial review is allowed. Jonathan Pelletier’s appeal is remitted for redetermination to a differently constituted appeal panel of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board.
-
13.
Hall v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2011 FC 1431 - 2011-12-07
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision rendered by an Appeal Panel of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board of Canada (the Appeal Panel), dated May 9, 2011. [...] [15] Disputes arising out of the Veterans Compensation Act are governed by the process set forth in the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act, SC 1995, c 18 [VRABA]. [...] Section 4 of the VRABA establishes the Veterans Review and Appeal Board.
-
14.
Ladouceur v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2010 FC 1148 - 2010-11-16
Federal Court DecisionsIn the present application the Applicant is requesting judicial review of a decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board dated July 9, 2009. [...] e. On 7 February, 2007 a different panel of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board maintained the assessment at 5%. [...] Did the Veterans Review and Appeal Board err in law, exceed its jurisdiction or breach the rules of natural justice by consulting a Medical Advisor of Veterans Affairs Canada?
-
15.
Arial v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2013 FC 602 - 2013-06-05
Federal Court Decisions[14] On January 24, 2007, a review panel of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board confirmed the ministerial decision of August 8, 2006. [...] (a) the applicant has obtained the permission of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board; or [...] (b) the Veterans Review and Appeal Board has referred the application to the Minister for reconsideration.
-
16.
Whitehead v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2003 FCT 75 - 2003-01-24
Federal Court Decisions[16] The Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act[11] provides for the establishment of the Board, its mandate, powers and duties. [...] a) Standard of Review [19] In McTague v. Canada (Attorney General)[12], Justice Evans, then of the Trial Division of this Court, had before him a decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board, as here, dismissing an appeal from the Board's review panel. [...] the Veterans' Appeal Board, the predecessor to the Veterans Review and Appeal Board, made under the Veterans' Appeal Board Act[14], the predecessor to the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act. For the purposes of this matter, the role of the Veterans' Appeal Board was essentially similar to that of the Veterans Review and
-
17.
Schut v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2003 FC 1323 - 2003-11-10
Federal Court DecisionsHe appealed this decision to a review panel of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board pursuant to s.s. 19(1) of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act, S.C. 1995, c. 18. [...] The Applicant appealed this decision to an appeal panel of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board ("Appeal Board"). [...] Sections 3 and 39 of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act create liberal and purposive guidelines for claims for veteran's pensions.
-
18.
Macdonald v. Canada (Attorney General) - 1999-03-11
Federal Court DecisionsThe Veterans Review and Appeal Board affirmed that decision on 27 March 1997. [...] [6] In 1995, Parliament created the Veterans Review and Appeal Board when it enacted the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act, S.C. 1995, c.18. [...] The Board functions as the sole review and appeal authority for veterans" pensions, replacing the Veterans Appeal Board, the Pension Review Board, and the War Veterans Allowance Board.
-
19.
Brychka v. Canada (Attorney General) - 1998-02-02
Federal Court Decisions[15] The Veterans Review and Appeal Board was created by Parliament in 1995 by the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act ("VRABA"). [...] It replaced the former Veterans Appeal Board, the former Pension Review Board and the former War Veterans Allowance Board. [...] The Veterans Review and Appeal Board (hereafter the "Board") now acts as the sole review and appeal authority for war veterans' pensions.
-
20.
Hiscock v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2018 FC 727 - 2018-07-12
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Canada Entitlement Reconsideration Panel [the Reconsideration Panel] heard October 18, 2017, which denied a request to reopen a decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Canada Entitlement Appeal Panel [the Appeal [...] [8] Mr. Hiscock appealed the VAC decision to the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Canada Entitlement Review Panel [the Review Panel] which heard the matter in January 2013. [...] [10] Review Panel decisions may be appealed to the Appeal Panel. In November 2013, the Applicant, in her capacity as the veteran’s surviving widow, appealed the Review Panel’s dismissal to the Appeal Panel pursuant to subsection 50(3) of the Act. The Appeal Panel affirmed the Review Panel’s decision.
-
21.
Hardy Estate v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2015 FC 1151 - 2015-10-08
Federal Court DecisionsThis appeal resulted in a further decision of July 2, 2010 by a Review Panel. [...] If the decision was clearly in error then an appeal or a judicial review should have been pursued. [...] In Arial, the widow of a veteran sought judicial review of a decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board of Canada which denied an application for reconsideration regarding retroactive entitlement to a pension for a health issue.
-
22.
Arial v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2011 FC 848 - 2011-07-08
Federal Court DecisionsAlthough section 39 of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act requires that the Board accept uncontradicted evidence, this evidence must be credible. [...] (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), where a pension is awarded for a disability and the Minister or, in the case of a review or an appeal under the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act, the Veterans Review and Appeal Board is of the opinion that the pension should be awarded from a day earlier than the day prescribed by [...] The Court refers the case back to the Veterans Review and Appeal Board so that the Board can review its responsibilities toward the Arial family.
-
23.
Jansen v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2017 FC 8 - 2017-01-03
Federal Court Decisions[5] The Applicant appealed this decision to an entitlement review panel (“Review Panel”) of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board (“VRAB”). [...] [13] In its analysis, the Appeal Panel stated that it applied the requirements of s 39 of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act, SC 1995, c 18 (“VRAB Act”), which it set out. [...] Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act, SC 1995 c 18 Construction Principe général
-
24.
Giannoulakis v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2003 FCT 703 - 2003-06-04
Federal Court Decisions[1] The applicant, Helen Giannoulakis, the widow of the late Vasilio Giannoulakis, who died on April 21, 1997, seeks to set aside a decision of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board (the "Board") made on November 19, 2001. [...] Sections 3 and 39 of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act, S.C. 1995, ch. 18 (the "VRAB Act"), are also relevant and I hereby reproduce them: [...] The absence of a right of appeal from the Veterans Review and Appeal Board, and the exclusive jurisdiction and finality provisions (sections 26 and 31 of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act) are indicative that Parliament did not intend the Board's decisions to be subject to close judicial surveillance.
-
25.
Robertson v. Canada - 2010 FC 233 - 2010-03-01
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by the Veterans Review and Appeal Board (VRAB) Appeal Board dated February 28, 2007, wherein the VRAB Appeal Board upheld the findings of the VRAB Entitlement Review Panel dated July 21, 2006, denying further retroactivity of Mrs. Robertson’s disability benefits [...] [...] [22] Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act, 1995, c. 18: [...] Construction [...] According to the Applicants, the Review Panel and the Appeal Board erred in their application of the Pension Act and the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act.