Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20140414


Docket:

T-1237-13

Citation: 2014 FC 359

Toronto, Ontario, April 14, 2014

PRESENT:    The Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes

BETWEEN:

PATTERNED CONCRETE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND PATTERNED CONCRETE ONTARIO INC.

Plaintiffs

and

JOSE LUIS HORTA

Defendant

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT

[1]               The Plaintiffs have brought a motion in writing, ex parte, for judgment against the Defendant, no Defence or other document has been filed by the Defendant.

[2]               Service on the Defendant, an individual person, was effected by Registered Mail. The record indicated that the Defendant signed a receipt thus service was effected under Rule 128(1)(e). Further the record contains a letter from the Defendant sent by Registered Mail to the Plaintiffs’ solicitors stating:

To clarify matters, all business cards and any other advertisements for Peel Concrete with the wording, patterned concrete, have been destroyed and in the future will never be used again.

[3]               In view of the foregoing there is no basis for an injunction or delivery up.

[4]               As to damages the Plaintiffs have filed the Affidavit of Guido which only speculates as to damages, and speaks only in general terms. No actual damages have been proven. The fact that another Judge may have given damages of $24,000.00 in a similar case is not a basis for seeking similar or greater damages here. That Judge may have had a different record. Damages must be proved, generalizations are insufficient. I will award nominal damages of $1,000.00.

[5]               I will award costs in the amount requested as the record satisfies me that they are appropriate.

 


JUDGMENT

UPON EX PARTE MOTION by Patterned Concrete Industries, Inc. and Patterned Concrete Ontario Inc. (Plaintiffs) for judgment against Jose Luis Horta (Defendant):

AND FOR THE REASONS GIVEN;

 

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that:

1.                                          This Court grants a declaration that the Defendant has infringed the Plaintiffs’ rights in the registered trade-mark PATTERNED CONRETE, registration no. TMA256184;

2.                                          This Court grants damages in the amount of $1,000.00 for trade-mark infringement, depreciation of the goodwill in the registered trade-mark PATTERNED CONCRETE and activity contrary to Section 7(b) of the Trade-marks Act;

3.                                          This Court grants the costs in the proceeding in the amount of $1,954.95.

 

“Roger T. Hughes”

Judge

 

 

 


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


 

DOCKET:

T-1237-13

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

PATTERNED CONCRETE INDUSTRIES, INC. AND PATTERNED CONCRETE ONTARIO INC. v.

JOSE LUIS HORTA

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT:

HUGHES J.

 

DATED:

April 14, 2014

 

APPEARANCES:

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Michael Adams

RICHES, McKENZIE & HERBERT LLP

 

 

For The PLAINTIFFS

 

 

N/A

Self-Represented

 

 

For The DEFENDANT

(Self-Represented)

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.