Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040211

Docket: IMM-1685-03

Citation: 2004 FC 222

Toronto, Ontario, February 11th, 2004

Present:           The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell                                  

BETWEEN:

                                                                      JINHUA ZHAO

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                 In the present case, the Applicant claims refugee protection on the basis of persecution on the ground of religious in the People's Republic of China.

[2]                 The hearing before the IRB was concluded on February 14, 2002. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Applicant was asked to provide documentation to the panel members to demonstrate her residence in China after 1991, and was given two weeks to provide this documentation.    There is no dispute that the requested documentation was delivered by hand to the IRB on February 25, 2002.


[3]                 The IRB did not render its decision until February 18, 2003, more than one year after the conclusion of the hearing. In its decision, the IRB made a negative finding respecting the Applicant's identity, but in doing so, it is not disputed that the Applicant's requested documentation was not considered. There is no explanation on the tribunal record to account for this significant failure.

[4]                 Counsel for the Respondent concedes that the failure of the IRB to take the evidence of identity into account would, in most cases, constitute a denial of natural justice that would warrant setting aside the decision. I find that this is such a case.

                                                                            ORDER

Accordingly, I set aside the IRB's decision and refer the matter to a differently constituted panel for redetermination.

"Douglas R. Campbell"

line

                                                                                                                                                               J.F.C.                        


FEDERAL COURT

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                    IMM-1685-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                   JINHUA ZHAO

                                                                                                                                                         Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                           TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                               FEBRUARY 11, 2004

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY :                                  CAMPBELL J.

DATED:                                                        FEBRUARY 11, 2004

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Nancy Myles Elliott

FOR APPLICANT

Mr. David Tyndale

FOR RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Nancy Myles Elliott

Barrister and Solicitor

Markham, Ontario

FOR APPLICANT

                                                                                   

Morris Rosenberg                                                                          

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

FOR RESPONDENT


                          FEDERAL COURT

TRIAL DIVISION

                                            

Date: 20040211

Docket: IMM-1685-03

BETWEEN:

JINHUA ZHAO

                                                                                         

                                                                         Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                     Respondent

                                                                            

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER

                                                                           

                                                                                         


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.